What Is Ryzen 5 2600 Equivalent Intel
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-10600K
Price now 279$
Games supported 100%
Price now 308$
Games supported 100%
General info
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance rating | 406 | 354 |
| Value for money | 42.07 | 47.42 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ | Comet Lake |
| Release date | 19 April 2018 (3 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $262 |
| Price now | $279 (1.4x MSRP) | $308 (1.2x MSRP) |
Value for money
To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
Technical specs
Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1200 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| SIPP | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Max video memory | - | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | - | 1.2 GHz |
| InTru 3D | - | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | - | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | - | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | - | 4096 x 2160@30Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | - | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | - | 4096 x 2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
- TrueCrypt AES
- x264 encoding pass 2
- x264 encoding pass 1
- WinRAR 4.0
- wPrime 32
- Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
- Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
- Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
- Passmark
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.
x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.
x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.
WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent enough GPU to perform well.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 15.05 | 16.61 |
| Novelty | 19 April 2018 | 30 April 2020 |
| Cost | $199 | $262 |
| Boost clock speed | 3900 | 4800 |
| Base clock speed | 3400 | 4100 |
| Chip lithography | 12 | 14 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 65 | 125 |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
Intel Core i5-10600K
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
Competitors of Ryzen 5 2600 by Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 2600 from Intel is Core i5-10500, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 2600:
Competitors of Core i5-10600K by AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i5-10600K from AMD is Ryzen 7 2700E, which is faster by 1% and higher by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i5-10600K:
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
User rating
Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.
3670 ratings
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
535 ratings
Intel Core i5-10600K
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Core i5-10600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
What Is Ryzen 5 2600 Equivalent Intel
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Ryzen-5-2600-vs-Core-i5-10600K
