What Is Ryzen 5 2600 Equivalent Intel
Price now 279$ Games supported 100% Price now 308$ Games supported 100% Comparing Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors. Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Information on Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology. Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks. Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K are enumerated here. Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any. Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K integrated GPUs. Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces. APIs supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K. Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle. TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor. Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes called Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources. Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Let's see how good Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent enough GPU to perform well. Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Core i5-10600K Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600 and Core i5-10600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU. We believe that the nearest equivalent to Ryzen 5 2600 from Intel is Core i5-10500, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 2600: We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i5-10600K from AMD is Ryzen 7 2700E, which is faster by 1% and higher by 4 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i5-10600K: We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself. 3670 ratings AMD Ryzen 5 2600 535 ratings Intel Core i5-10600K Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 2600 or Core i5-10600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSAMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-10600K
General info
Place in performance rating 406 354 Value for money 42.07 47.42 Market segment Desktop processor Desktop processor Series AMD Ryzen 5 no data Architecture codename Zen+ Comet Lake Release date 19 April 2018 (3 years ago) 30 April 2020 (1 year ago) Launch price (MSRP) $199 $262 Price now $279 (1.4x MSRP) $308 (1.2x MSRP) Technical specs
Physical cores 6 (Hexa-Core) 6 (Hexa-Core) Threads 12 12 Base clock speed 3.4 GHz 4.1 GHz Boost clock speed 3.9 GHz 4.8 GHz L1 cache 96K (per core) 64K (per core) L2 cache 3 MB 256K (per core) L3 cache 16 MB (shared) 12 MB (shared) Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm Die size 192 mm2 no data Maximum core temperature no data 100 °C Maximum case temperature (TCase) no data 72 °C Number of transistors 4,800 million no data 64 bit support + + Windows 11 compatibility + + Unlocked multiplier + + Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 (Uniprocessor) 1 Socket AM4 FCLGA1200 Thermal design power (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction set extensions SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 AES-NI + + AVX + + vPro no data + Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) no data + Turbo Boost Technology no data 2.0 Hyper-Threading Technology no data + TSX no data - Idle States no data + Thermal Monitoring no data + SIPP no data + Turbo Boost Max 3.0 no data - Security technologies
TXT no data + EDB no data + Secure Key no data + Identity Protection no data + SGX no data Yes with Intel® ME OS Guard no data + Virtualization technologies
AMD-V + + VT-d no data + VT-x no data + EPT no data + Memory specs
Supported memory types DDR4 Dual-channel DDR4-2666 Maximum memory size 64 GB 128 GB Max memory channels 2 2 Maximum memory bandwidth 46.933 GB/s 41.6 GB/s ECC memory support + - Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics card - Intel UHD Graphics 630 Max video memory - 64 GB Quick Sync Video - + Clear Video - + Clear Video HD - + Graphics max frequency - 1.2 GHz InTru 3D - + Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported - 3 Graphics image quality
4K resolution support - + Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 - 4096 x 2160@30Hz Max resolution over eDP - 4096 x 2304@60Hz Max resolution over DisplayPort - 4096 x 2304@60Hz Graphics API support
Peripherals
PCIe version 3.0 3.0 PCI Express lanes 20 16 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 15.05 16.61 Novelty 19 April 2018 30 April 2020 Cost $199 $262 Boost clock speed 3900 4800 Base clock speed 3400 4100 Chip lithography 12 14 Thermal design power (TDP) 65 125
Cast your vote
Competitors of Ryzen 5 2600 by Intel
Competitors of Core i5-10600K by AMD
Similar processor comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
What Is Ryzen 5 2600 Equivalent Intel
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Ryzen-5-2600-vs-Core-i5-10600K